facebookIs AutoWealth more cost-effective than a DIY approach with Interactive Brokers when dealing with more than USD100,000? - Seedly

Anonymous

31 Oct 2020

βˆ™

Robo-Advisors

Is AutoWealth more cost-effective than a DIY approach with Interactive Brokers when dealing with more than USD100,000?

Discussion (1)

What are your thoughts?

Learn how to style your text

Nicholas Beh

31 Oct 2020

Student Ambassador 2020/21 at Seedly

Interactive Brokers is pretty hard to beat when it comes to large amounts - they will not charge you any monthly minimum commission as long as you hold 100,000 USD or more in assets with them.

Autowealth charges a 0.5% + $18 fee which is rather attractive. A cursory look at a few reviews and blogposts tell me a few things:

  • The seem to offer a fairly decent exchange rate

  • They invest in US-domiciled ETFs (30% WHT!)

  • It does not appear that they factor in the costs of the ETFs (expense ratio)

I think investing into US-domiciled rather than Irish-domiciled ETFs is one of their biggest downsides, mainly because of the higher withholding tax rate of 30% (vs 15% for Irish-domiciled) and estate tax liability. They also seem to exclude ETF fees from the calculation of their fee so the overall costs are probably higher as well.

Personally, in this situation, I would rather invest into an Irish-domiciled, globally diversified ETF like VWRA/VWRD.

Write your thoughts