Comparing Stashaway (16%) and Syfe Global Portfolio (15%) and their investment strategies, how do you feel about this difference and their effectiveness in managing risk and delivering returns, beyond the template answer of how ERAA / ARI works?
Syfe 15% is a lot more US-heavy and bond-heavy than Stashaway 16%. Stashaway and Syfe both employ risk management strategies in deciding the optimal allocation of assets. However, the ERAA and ARI system respectively have produced rather different portfolio allocations in this uncertain climate. I was wondering what the general Seedly community feels about this difference and their effectiveness in managing risk and delivering returns, beyond the template answer of how ERAA / ARI works that can be easily obtained on their respective websites.
4
Discussion (4)
Learn how to style your text
Reply
Save
There's more than one way to skin a cat. (Sorry cat lovers!)
There is no standard template for investments. Each of the portfolios appeal to different types of investors. There is choice for everyone. What works for one might not be what the other would want.
Whether they are effective in managing risk and delivering returns, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Have to be in the market to experience the market, I guess.
Reply
Save
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products
StashAway
4.7
1293 Reviews
StashAway Simple Guaranteed 3.55% p.a. (Guaranteed rate)
Cash Management
INSTRUMENTS
None
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT FEE
None
MINIMUM INVESTMENT
3.5%
EXPECTED ANNUAL RETURN
Mobile App
PLATFORMS
Syfe
4.6
930 Reviews
Endowus
4.7
656 Reviews
Related Posts
Hi James, are you invested in these 2 portfolios ? if yes, would apprecite if you can please tell me which one is doing better.