Advertisement
Anonymous
I've seen a video on how the fees would stack up if someone were to use robo-advisors on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJIiCZAa2ig
It doesnt seem like the math is wrong.
2
Discussion (2)
Learn how to style your text
Luke Ho
11 Feb 2019
Founder and Director at CFX Money Maverick Pte Ltd
Reply
Save
Nicholes Wong
11 Feb 2019
Diploma in Business Management at Nanyang Polytechnic
You can definitely invest on the ETFs yourself with lower fees. Its just that robo advisors can rebalance for you and help you take care of your investment. DIY will be better as fees will be lower but it will take abit more effort. Some people dont like to think too much so putting money with robo advisor is easier for them.
Reply
Save
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products
4.7
1293 Reviews
StashAway Simple Guaranteed 3.55% p.a. (Guaranteed rate)
Cash Management
INSTRUMENTS
None
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT FEE
None
MINIMUM INVESTMENT
3.5%
EXPECTED ANNUAL RETURN
Mobile App
PLATFORMS
4.7
658 Reviews
4.6
933 Reviews
Related Posts
Advertisement
It's not about fees, its about the long run.
IF you're truly invested in the long run, it's certainly worth the risk. Asset allocation is 90% of the returns and it provides very decent asset allocation. So you have an alarmingly high risk-adjusted return, certainly higher than the STI ETF or even the SNP500 ETF (although the sharpe ratio is roughly the same and the SNP500 returns are higher).
But I mean if you're invested in the long run anyway, you should go for higher returns. Which you can get, if you're willing to take more risk. I can help you with that.