Anonymous
It seems like active investing is starting to go out of style, more people are looking to get passive income instead. Are the 2 comparable in terms of actual output?
12
Discussion (12)
Learn how to style your text
Pang Zhe Liang
24 Dec 2019
Fee-Based Financial Advisory Manager at Financial Alliance Pte Ltd (IFA Firm)
Reply
Save
Fees.
Active investment charge lots of fees for the management of the fund.
All is well if the funds performance justify the extra expenses, but over the decades so many researches and studies have pointed out that the extra fees does not justify the performance. Most funds are underperforming passive funds and the extra fees removed a big chunk of the performance gains of the fund itself.
With the internet, people know more and share more, hence more and more people realised active investing is not ideal for saving and investment
Reply
Save
I am practicing capital appreciation for my portfolio! :)
When things go out of style, it is good for value investors because there are less hardworking individuals in the stock market!
Reply
Save
Jonathan Chia Guangrong
18 Dec 2019
SOC at Local FI
I don't think it's going out of style. There will always be active investors around. And no, the output returns will not be the same. My income ceiling portfolio (active) generates returns of 40% or more compared to my income floor (passive) of about 6-7%.
Reply
Save
Bjorn Ng
17 Dec 2019
Business Analyst at 10x Capital
In other words, active investing can also be call trading. You are always monitoring the market 24/7...
Read 8 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
It depends on your investment objective and your style of play.
Personally, I prefer value investing since I can spend lesser time monitoring the market.
Either way, it funnels down to personal expectation.
Here is everything about me and what I do best.