If I already have a very good hospitalisation plan, do I still need CI cover after age 65? - Seedly
Seedly logo
Seedly logo
 

Insurance

Hospitalisation Insurance (H&S)

Critical Illness (CI)

Anonymous

Asked on 01 Jul 2020

If I already have a very good hospitalisation plan, do I still need CI cover after age 65?

0 comments

3 answers

Answer Now

Answers (3)

Sort By

Hi anon,

I personally feel that CI cover is still important even after 65.

In the event of a CI, hospitalization bills and follow up treatment (the post hospitalization coverage) will be covered up to year (13 months for some insurers) after discharge. What happens after that? Will you want to liquidate your investment assets and draw on savings in the bank to continue your treatment? A CI payout then will provide liquidity for you to ensure that you can continue treatment without having to sacrifice your retirement assets. If you recover but had liquidated a lot of assets, your retirement lifestyle would no doubt be impacted.

Self insuring is possible if you want to say, plan to set aside $300K at age 65, but to do that you would have to save $10K/yr for 30 years from age 35, and also leave the money in a risk free environment and never touch it.

However, let's say if you have $300K at the age of 55 and was thinking if you wanted to self insure. Getting a policy that would pay you $300K in the event of CI would probably cost something like $150K in total, meaning you can now spend the $150K on/in your retirement, knowing that $300K will still be made available upon CI, instead of having to have the $300K sit in a risk free instrument and force yourself not to touch it no matter what. This is the leverage power that comes with insurance.

Just some food for thought.

Edit: (Amendment in bold...not $10/yr but $10K/yr)

2 comments

ūüĎć 4
Hariz Arthur Maloy
Hariz Arthur Maloy

02 Jul 2020

Boss, $10k/yr not $10/yr ah. Haha.
Elijah Lee
Elijah Lee

03 Jul 2020

Oops. The perils of replying in the middle of the night. Amended!
Tay WenHao
Tay WenHao
Level 7. Grand Master
Answered on 01 Jul 2020

Depends. If you have enough savings (300k or more at age 65), I would say not necessary. You can 'self-insure' yourself.

The main reason for CI/ECI coverage is not so much on medical fees because it's covered by hospitalization / Integrated Shield plan. Its more to cover your loss of income when hospitalised and during treatment.

At age 65, if you are retired, you dont need to worry about the loss of income and with enough savings, it should be sufficient for you to tide through.

0 comments

ūüĎć 1

Hospitalisation coverage and critical illness coverage are for different purposes. Generally, the former is to cover for medical bills on a reimbursement basis while the latter issues a lump sum payout upon meeting the terms and conditions of the policy.

More Details:

Is MediShield Life enough in Singapore?

Integrated Shield Plan Singapore: A Starter's Guide

Since not all costs are related to medical bills, e.g. hiring helper, home modification, supplements, therefore, it is usually suggested to have critical illness coverage for as long as you live.

More Details:

5 Reasons why You need Life Insurance - Critical Illness

I share quality content on estate planning and financial planning here.

0 comments

ūüĎć 0