facebookWhy term until 65? - Seedly

Advertisement

Anonymous

18 Apr 2019

βˆ™

Insurance

Why term until 65?

I saw many advice on getting term till 65, why is that so? if that is the case, why do I see some insurance agents themselves getting term SA of 1mil or more and looking it as part of legacy for their nx generation in future?

Discussion (2)

What are your thoughts?

Learn how to style your text

Hariz Arthur Maloy

29 Mar 2019

Independent Financial Advisor at Promiseland Independent

65 is supposedly our retirement age and some would argue that since you're not generating an income after you retire, you don't need to be insured.

However, some advisors use insurance as a guaranteed means to leave behind a legacy. 1m bought especially when early is actually quite cheap. And if you die at age 85 or so, it would give you a guaranteed 5+% return on your money.

Especially if you add a waiver in the event of illness and you kena illness at an early stage also but survive.

Insurance is flexible. It's up to you how you want to use it.

I have a 500k term to 99, and another 500k term to 65.

I plan on having my kids continue paying the premiums of my Term to 99. Whoever takes care of me, will have the money for their family. Hehe. ;)

Nicholes Wong

29 Mar 2019

Diploma in Business Management at Nanyang Polytechnic

Because usually your kids would usually be able to take care of themselves by the time you are 65, hence they do not need your income to survive by then. Some people are getting 1million term insurance because they take into account future expenses and debts. So if they buy 1million coverage now, it is cheaper to buy now than buying later and it is pretty affordable.

Everyone is different, you have to get insurance and coverage that is the most suitable for you.

Write your thoughts

Advertisement