facebookNew Endowus Core Flagship Portfolio Very Aggressive - Seedly

Advertisement

New Endowus Core Flagship Portfolio Very Aggressive

I am invested in Endowus Core Flagship portfolio under "very agressive" which was a 100% equities allocation. Recently, I was prompted to do a rebalancing for the said portfolio above into their new underlying holdings for their updated Core Flagship portfolio. I took a look at their updated Core Flagship portfolio, and saw that the new underlying holdings no longer consisted of 100% equities. The new underlying holdings consisted of 85% equities and 15% "Cash and Equivalents". Can someone advise on why this approach is taken for the "very agressive" Core Flagship portfolio? 15% seems like quite a fairly large portion to be kept out of equities, which I had assumed was the best instrument to maximise returns over a long investment period. I also do not understand the holdings under the "Cash and Collaterals". Can someone shed some light on it please? Thank you.

Discussion (3)

What are your thoughts?

Learn how to style your text

Hi Jacen, usually these Funds have < 1% holdings in 'Cash or Equivalents' for re-balancing purposes. The list of 'Holdings' looks correct but not the 15% total (in bold green).

I think it is 'overkill' to have 7 different funds to capture Global equities market. Personally, I use Fund Smart by setting up 2 different goals with 0.3% Access Fees (as compared to their Core/Flagship with higher fees up to 0.6% unless you have $5m). The only feature lost in Fund Smart is the 're-balancing' feature, for that you can manually do that once a year with some simple math.

  • iShares Developed World Index Fund (IE): 80%
  • Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets Fund: 20%

So if you regularly invest $1000, allocate $800 to iShare Developed and $200 to Amundi EM Fund. If you believe in Dimensional, you can also do the same with the 2 similar Dimensional Funds:

  • Dimensional Global Core Equity Fund 80%
  • Dimensional Emerging Markets Large Cap Core Equity Fund 20%
comment
View 1 replies

Maybe recent market rally had caused the underlying holding imbalance?

comment

Write your thoughts

Advertisement