Hi anon,
ā
It's actually not about life expectancy. What happens if you have CI coverage till 85 but you have a stroke at age 86?
ā
The purpose of CI coverage is twofold. The first purpose (and the one that you read about most often) is that of income replacement; if we are very ill, it is unlikely that we can work. Or, if we are diagnosed with the early stages of CI, we might want the option to take some time off (i.e. no pay leave) to focus on making a full recovery.
ā
During this period, we will definitely experience a loss in income. However, what is probably more realistic is the fact that we will need to ensure that our expenses are met.
ā
The second purpose, and the one that many people forget about, is alternative treatment costs. This is a very broad term but it does cover costs relating to (non exhaustive)
- Off label drugs
- Second medical opinion
- TCM
- Cost of hired help if that is required
- Supplements for recovery
- Co-payment for hospital bills since our ISP riders no longer cover the full bill
If shield plans were to cover all of that, the premiums would be through the room.
ā
It's quite clear that such costs are risks that are present regardless of whether you are working, or you are retired.
ā
On the topic of economic sense, just note that you have to look at the numbers for your case, so it's hard to comment for your specific situation. However, in general, if you want CI cover past 70, term is not so cost efficient.
ā
For death coverage, you really only need it as long as you are having liabilities or dependents. Till age 65/70 is typically good enough.
Hi anon,
ā
It's actually not about life expectancy. What happens if you have CI coverage till 85 but you have a stroke at age 86?
ā
The purpose of CI coverage is twofold. The first purpose (and the one that you read about most often) is that of income replacement; if we are very ill, it is unlikely that we can work. Or, if we are diagnosed with the early stages of CI, we might want the option to take some time off (i.e. no pay leave) to focus on making a full recovery.
ā
During this period, we will definitely experience a loss in income. However, what is probably more realistic is the fact that we will need to ensure that our expenses are met.
ā
The second purpose, and the one that many people forget about, is alternative treatment costs. This is a very broad term but it does cover costs relating to (non exhaustive)
If shield plans were to cover all of that, the premiums would be through the room.
ā
It's quite clear that such costs are risks that are present regardless of whether you are working, or you are retired.
ā
On the topic of economic sense, just note that you have to look at the numbers for your case, so it's hard to comment for your specific situation. However, in general, if you want CI cover past 70, term is not so cost efficient.
ā
For death coverage, you really only need it as long as you are having liabilities or dependents. Till age 65/70 is typically good enough.