Asked by Bernard Soh

What are your thought about philip sing income etf? For long term investment, is it better than sti etf?

1
0
Share this
Answer this question
Add
Add
Select
Clear
Add
Write your answer

Answers (1)

Sort by:
Most Upvote
  • Most Recent
  • Most Upvote
    • Lok Yang Teng
      Lok Yang Teng

      Top Contributor (Jan)

      285 Answers, 390 Upvotes
      Answered on 09 Nov 2018

      tl;dr: More expensive, better returns and more conservative.

      There are two ETFs for STI. In comparison, SPDR STI ETF has lesser expense ratio (0.3%) and smaller annualised tracking errorm so we'll just be comparing with SPDR STI ETF.

      Management fee for Phillip SING Income ETF is 0.40% p.a, excluding other fees such as index licensing, trustee and auditor fees, etc (capped at maximum 0.7%). The top 10 stocks in index are similar to those in the STI ETF however the weightage is different. STI weights the stocks based on market capitalisation whereas Phillip SING Income ETF weighs it using their composite factor scores. STI sector allocation is 57.23% Financials, followed by 11.95% in Industrials. As for Phillip SING Income ETF, it comprises of Financial Services 31%, REIT 24% and Telecommunications 17%, which is more balanced and conservative since REITS and Telecom gives steady flow of dividends.

      SPDR STI ETF has 10 Years Annualised of 8.44%, compared to Phillip SING Income ETF of 9.6% (2005-2018).

      Comments (0)
      1
      0
      Share this

Download Seedly’s free

Expense Tracking App
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • Sync all your banks in one place
    Sync all your banks in one place
  • Quickly add transactions and view reports
    Quickly add transactions and view reports
  • Community Q&A and blog integration
    Community Q&A and blog integration