Discussion (3)
Learn how to style your text
Isaac Chan
04 Dec 2019
Business at NUS
Reply
Save
I think Isaac really hit the nail on its head with the proven lower returns from '08 to present day.
To elaborate on Zann's last point, I believe its not so much so extreme as to when SG's competitiveness is diminished but rather the dependency of core businesses in our country to foreign exports. Disregarding Bank Stocks + ComfortDelGro, local SG companies of scale are intertwined some form of Global Operations and heavily influenced by foreign markets while also not sharing the full upside during US/China booms (possibly due to lower volume and liquidity of SGX markets in general). Therefore this resulted in a somewhat stagnant STI returns from the course of '08 till today.
Reply
Save
Hello!
i personally feel that there is a lack of diversification in the STI ETFs since it is heavil...
Read 1 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
I think one of the main disadvantages would be the low returns of the STI (blue line), especially when compared against the S&P500 (red line). All of them started off the around the same post 0'8 crisis, but their difference as of today is quite stark. You can tell a significant increase from the S&P, but the STI index has hardly moved, merely making similar gains and losses such that the net effect is eliminated.
If you had put your money in the S&P, which has a much more diversified base than the STI (with much of its weight on the banks), you would have clearly done much better. The S&P is not heavily weighted too much on a certain company (as compared to STI), and many of these companies have got huge international exposure like Apple, Shell etc. From a risk diversification point of view, the S&P seems stronger.