It seems to make more sense for me to invest in areas that I'm actually interested in, as it's assumed that i'll know more about companies in these spaces. What do you guys think?
5
Discussion (5)
Learn how to style your text
William Seah
21 Apr 2020
Financial services consultant at Pias
Reply
Save
Elijah Lee
13 Apr 2020
Senior Financial Services Manager at Phillip Securities (Jurong East)
Hi Sarah,
There is no harm to invest in what you are interested in, but you will need to consider risk management as well. This means having negatively (or zero) correlated asset classes in your portfolio so that your entire portfolio has a much lower volatility compared to investing in a single asset class.
I'd suggest that if you are going to focus on very specific areas (e.g. single sector, single country, etc), you'll want to limit exposure to around 20% of your portfolio so that you can still get upside, but will be able to limit your downside risk.
Reply
Save
Colin Lim
13 Apr 2020
Financial Services Consultant at Colin Lim
Invest in sectors that you understand and have potential to grow. Tech is a good choice.
Diversified...
Read 2 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
Thats a really good question. It reflecrs awareness of your limitations.
From a purely theoretical perspective it is not the right move. In theory information is widely available and you should explore all avenues.
In practice this may not hold. We delve in deeper into areas we have interest in. We will, no matter how deep we go, wont be able to go in deep into understanding areas we have no interest in. Interest drives research, and research drives interest.
So yes I agree with your idea. Go into areas you are interested in, but don't neglect other areas. Find ways to stem the gap, by getting advisory services.