Anonymous
Most articles have said to sell the 'winners' and buy the 'losers' to get to the desired allocation. However instead of selling, I could also top up which ever asset that is falling behind. Is there any difference in the two? Wouldn't selling and buying incur more trading fees than just topping up the 'losers'?
1
Discussion (1)
Learn how to style your text
Reply
Save
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products
4.5
956 Reviews
US$1
MINIMUM FEE
0.03% to 0.08%
TRADING FEES
Custodian
STOCK HOLDING TYPE
4.3
426 Reviews
4.9
124 Reviews
Related Posts
Versus let the winners run (my strategy), I never rebalanced,
though many recommend to, because of total portfolio risk
stabilization.
however particularly the 'winners' could be also 'winners' in the future.βββ