Anonymous
I’ve read many books and articles saying most funds underperform as compared to indexes so I’m a bit apprehensive?
4
Discussion (4)
Learn how to style your text
Luke Ho
Edited 26 Apr 2022
Founder and Director at CFX Money Maverick Pte Ltd
Reply
Save
When financial consultants proclaimed that passive index ETFs 100% underperform the market, it always seems to me that they are trying to find an excuse as to why active funds underperformed the benchmarks/markets. Of course, passive underperform because it is not in their nature to outperform the market.
The objective of passive investing is for the fund to track the benchmark efficiently.
If you are going with the active route, there are cheaper ways to get active exposure. For example, actively managed / smart-beta ETFs. They generally cost cheaper than an actively managed mutual fund. (Note that a unit trust is a form of mutual fund).
And as you have pointed out, it is true that most active funds underperform. The probability of a financial consultant picking winning active funds consistently over the long run is very very slim, which is just as good as the probability of active managers picking winning stocks.
As retail investors, you are better off with picking passive ETFs to form the bulk of your portfolio if you are not willing to spend a lot of time researching on individual stocks. No harm allocating 5 to 10 per cent of your portfolio to active funds if you are so inclined.
Anyway, I am starting a financial blog. Do check it out.
Reply
Save
Ngooi Zhi Cheng
09 Oct 2019
Student Ambassador 2020/21 at Seedly
Hi,
Contrary to popular belief: There is still a use for UTs.
In a market where market informati...
Read 2 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
Hi Anonymous, I happened to have chanced upon this while seeing someone responding to one of my answers from years ago.
It's natural to be apprehensive as most Unit Trusts are actively managed and by extension, charge a much heftier fee, which certainly affects investment returns.
The problem with your current sources on many books and articles is that they typically come back to the same piece of research, which is SPIVA - or the Standard and Poor Indices and Active. This is a comparison to show funds that underperform compared to indices.
There are many viable criticisms for this line of study, but much of it was covered briefly by Samuel below. Most of the categories are not only effiicient-market based, but they are also wrongly compared: as this article will highlight - where if you feel MOST actively managed funds underperform their benchmarks: ALL passive investing underperforms their benchmarks. All.
For the most part, as an investment specialist I'd love to help you out if you're still looking for opportunities, especially during this time of Covid where the market is much lower from its previous highs.
Luke https://www.facebook.com/luke.ho.54