Asked by Anonymous
Asked on 17 May 2019
It depends on how you want to play the game. If you are totally risk averse, a retirement plan or GEPLR can work for you. However, return might not be the best compared to investing in funds, equities etc
You might want to diversify and take calculated risk so that you can have some money that gives you a more conservative return in participating policies like GEPLR and also have some money working hard in funds or equities that will pay off in the future.
In short, if your investment time horizon is more than 15-20 years, you are better off with broad-market globally diversified ETFs. Cost wise and return, it will crush almost any annuity.
One ETF in mind ("no effort" and long-term buy and hold) is Vanguard Total World Stock.
Go read the following books before embarking on any investment plan, 1) The Intelligent Investor by Ben Graham, 2) The Little Book of Common Sense Investing by John Bogle
It will served you well. Get into habit your own due diligence before emarking on any investment.
How old are you?
I'm going to take a fairly decent assumption here and assume that if you can afford to lump sum an annuity at the moment - and that you understand how Great Eastern Prestige Life Rewards works - that you have the time horizon for investing.
There are exceptions to whether a par fund from an insurance company can beat an investment, as I wrote about it here:
However, the majority of the time what is likely to happen is that your investments, despite the higher risk and fluctuations, is going to make far more money than a standard annuity.
That being said, I would not rush into an ETF like the STI ETF.
To quote Jonathan Ng's answer from Seedly below:
' Just to put things into context to compare with the PLR2, the SPDR STI ETF (ES3) has an annualized return of 3.49%, inclusive of dividends, for the past 5 years. This is much higher than the PLR2’s guaranteed returns of 1.62% per year. '
3.49% in the last 5 years is abysmal.
With a 20 year plus time horizon (which I suspect you have), some of the funds I'm offering have made more than that.
The funds that I am using for my personal retirement portfolio - and because you're looking at retirement I assume its relevant - has done 17.3% in the last 5 years, net of fees.
Otherwise, if you feel that the hassle is a lot and you'd rather passively toss that lump sum in while focusing on what you're good at, you can always purchase GE's annuity or a similar Annuity plan.
Whether you choose the safer option or investing, I would suggest you consider talking seriously to a professional who is well versed in both. You can always reach out to me below.
Just note that ETFs are NOT risk free, so not really useful to compare against a risk free product.
If your main consideration is risk free, then can consider SSB, though would be difficult to place a large sum into it in one go. May have to split across succeeding months.
There are better return from other companies... Life annuities. Or spilt this 500k into better solutions.. Leverage this 500k even better.
Hi there! I went to compare both products and this is what I've came up with:
The Great Eastern Prestige Life Rewards 2 (PLR2) is different from ETFs as it includes an insurance death benefit component, on top of wealth accumulation. It is also a more passive strategy than ETFs.
However, looking only at the investment returns, ETFs is a better strategy than the PLR2.
What is Great Eastern Prestige Life Rewards 2?
It is a life annuity that guarantees monthly lifetime payout with a single premium payment. This can allow you to enhance your retirement income and leave an inheritance for your loved ones.
The single standard premium is $500,000 and can be either in SGD or USD.
So what exactly is a life annuity?
An annuity is a type of insurance policy that usually guarantees fixed payouts at regular time intervals for life or for a fixed period. CPF Life is one such example of an annuity plan that all Singaporeans have.
Here are some key features of the PLR2:
What does it not cover?
With the above benefits, the PLR2 sounds good but it lacks coverage in the following areas:
Source: Great Eastern
How do you know if the PLR2 is suitable for yourself?
If the following is important to you:
Then the PLR2 maybe a good fit for you!
With that said, please also remember to do your own due diligence before buying into the product! Further areas to consider on the PLR2 are its investment returns based on historical performance and comparing it with annuity policies from other insurance companies.
Source: Central Provident Fund Board
If you are looking at retirement planning, I would recommend maximizing your CPF Life first before supplementing it with a private life annuity plan. This is because the guaranteed returns of 4% or more per year is a lot higher! It is also a risk-free way of getting passive returns as it is backed by the government.
You can top-up your Special Account in cash if below age 55, and Retirement Account if above age 55. Additionally, this would entitle you to tax relief of up to $7,000 per year.
Is investing in Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) the next best option?
I’m sure many of us know what ETFs are so I’m not going to go into the details.
In the broad spectrum of investing, ETFs is considered a “passive” approach to investing in an equity portfolio for long-term investment. However, it is not exactly passive as you would still have to monitor the index the ETF is tracking from time to time to see if it is performing.
There are also various risks involved with ETFs:
You are recommended to read the ETF’s prospectus before buying in!
Just to put things into context to compare with the PLR2, the SPDR STI ETF (ES3) has an annualized return of 3.49%, inclusive of dividends, for the past 5 years. This is much higher than the PLR2’s guaranteed returns of 1.62% per year.
You can read more on the STI ETFs here: https://blog.seedly.sg/spdr-sti-etf-vs-nikko-am-sti-etf/
My Personal Thoughts
The PLR2 is different from ETFs as it includes an insurance component, on top of the investments. Additional to wealth accumulation, if you would require the insurance death benefit component, then the PLR2 is for you. It is also a more passive strategy than ETFs.
However, if you are only looking at the investment returns, then ETFs is a better strategy than PLR2. Even though ETFs have higher risks (though still lower than investing in equities), it has historically shown to achieve higher returns.