Asked by Anonymous
Asked on 31 Dec 2018
There is surrender value of about 1.5k after surrendering. After reading many threads, I do feel insurance should not be mixed with investment. Am I giving the right advice to cancel?
It's very reckless to cancel something based on reading off a bunch of threads. Accurately, Pulsar typically doesn't have an insurance element.
There still has to be a lot more specifics like how long the plan has been going on - and you have to remember that high fees are offset by the starting bonus. Something that has that much of a headstart and compounding exponentially can easily offset high fees. Easily.
And you can only determine exponential compounding by going over the asset allocation. Which you should do. Justify the cancellation on a wide range of information, not limited ones.
Aside from that, if you're going to tell someone to cancel a plan and lose their money, TAKE responsibility for it. They have to be actively doing something to make that the money and show them projections for reassurance, at the very least.
I think it really depends on the Pulsar Policy etc. We are looking and moving forward instead of lamenting on what's done.
We will need to evaluate the fees involved. If its just starting (which should be from the surrender value), need to evaluate whether does it make sense to continue or surrender. No straight answer, it depends.
Pulsar doesnt have much of an insurance unless u choose the enhanced death benefit.
But to me the cost structure is too high. ( Account Maintenance Fee , Investment Management Fee, Administrative Fee, Policy Maintenance Fee ) There are way lower cost platforms in the market.
yes you are right, never mix insurance with investment.
the only pple who advocates mixing insurance with investment are the pple who are selling the plans and profitting heavily from the huge commissions.
pulsar is a rubbish plan, better surrender before more losses are incurred.
likewise, when agents tell you that they "managed to get double digit returns on my client's pulsar policies over the last 2 years even after after the recent sell off", take it with a pinch of salt lol
Top Contributor (Jun)
If your reason is because investment shouldn't mix with insurance, then it's bad advice.
Pulsar almost no insurance.
It's an investment plan that allows you to invest in UTs usually not available to retail clients.
Instead, you should have looked at the portfolio allocation. I've managed to get double digit returns on my client's pulsar policies over the last 2 years even after after the recent sell off.