Advertisement
I thought that was quite a nice conclusion by him.
4
Discussion (4)
Learn how to style your text
Billy
02 Jul 2020
Development & Acquisitions Manager at Real Estate Private Equity
Reply
Save
Have you wondered why despite producing one of the brightest students in the world , we seldom have Singaporean being named as renowned scientists, entrepreneurs, architects or other professional jobs in the global scene?
The key word is "groupthink". Nobody will challenge a certain idea or policy because they desire harmony and conformity. This results in dysfunctional decisions being made. In the long term, even the brightest guy will lose the creativity and passion to chase after it's own beliefs.
Just imagine if big tech companies such as Apple , Facebook , Amazon adopt "groupthink", can they continue to innovate and outperform their competitors? In a company setting, we have people contesting ideas of a proposal. It is totally conducive & healthy and we can get the best consensus to solve a problem.
I support Jamus that we should not give a "blank cheque" to a ruling party, it will do more harm than good as they could become more complacent if left unchallenged.
Reply
Save
Clara Ng
02 Jul 2020
Community Manager at Seedly
The Workers' Party (WP) is not trying to deny the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) a strong mandat...
Read 1 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
Advertisement
To place things in a lighter perspective, I'd vision the ruling party as the Sun while the opposition party as Rain. And the people of Singapore as plants. In order for plants to grow and flower, you need both Sun and Rain. Too much of either and the plants will die (okay, kindda exaggerating here, but I think I made my point).
I do agree on the end goal which PAP aims to achieve i.e. create new jobs, lower costs etc. However, just like cooking an egg, there are tons of different methods one can do to achieve the outcome and that is where the voice of opposition comes in - to ensure that every method is well-thought through (during parliamentary debates), the pros and cons, the trade-offs. If a chef always cooks a sunny-side Up, he may never discover scrambled eggs.
It is indeed true that PAP will highly get the mandate (purely based on of seats contested), that being said, I do hope to see some opposition in there as well. Using the example of the cook, even though there are 90 cooks that only know how to cook a Sunny-side Up, all you need is 1 cook to demonstrate how to cook a scrambled egg for the current cooks to think.