Advertisement
Discussion (4)
Learn how to style your text
Reply
Save
From my perspective, the alternative is buying a REIT ETF because both offer a similar product, that is a ready-made diversified REIT portfolio in exchange for management/platform cost. If so, the robo investor may be more tax efficient since you hold the units directly, albeit through a custodian account. The REIT ETF will need to pay corporate taxes before it can distribute the dividends.
โ
If you are comfortable with picking individual REITs and buying these directly as an alternative, then the real issue is whether doing so is more cost efficient. The robo advisor allows you to drip small amounts into the investment portfolio. If you are buying individual REITs directly, brokerage fees/commissions require you to invest a certain sum before the investment becomes cost efficient.
Reply
Save
I invested 100K into SYFE REITS plus and the main reason why I do that is because it already helps m...
Read 1 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products
4.7
1296 Reviews
StashAway Simple Guaranteed 3.55% p.a. (Guaranteed rate)
Cash Management
INSTRUMENTS
None
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT FEE
None
MINIMUM INVESTMENT
3.5%
EXPECTED ANNUAL RETURN
Mobile App
PLATFORMS
4.7
657 Reviews
4.6
935 Reviews
Related Posts
Advertisement
For Robo REITs wise, I will recommend Syfe Reit+ without risk management. This is because they are buying into the reits directly. However, for StashAway, you're buying into the ETF. which there are costs incurred.