facebookShould I get AIA Pro Achiever 3.0? Any better alternatives? - Seedly

Advertisement

Anonymous

31 Aug 2023

Insurance

Should I get AIA Pro Achiever 3.0? Any better alternatives?

Their bonuses are very attractive but charges seem to be very high. Thought of using robo-advisor, but im not too sure either.

Discussion (12)

What are your thoughts?

Learn how to style your text

Ngooi Zhi Cheng

Edited 15 Sep 2023

Student Ambassador 2020/21 at Seedly

Hello,

Your question about AIA Pro Achiever 3.0 and the consideration of robo-advisors is an important one. Let's take a closer look at both options to help you make an informed decision.

AIA Pro Achiever 3.0:

Pros:

  • Attractive Bonuses: It's true that this plan offers appealing bonuses, which can significantly enhance your returns over time. These bonuses are structured to reward policyholders for their long-term commitment.
  • Investment Flexibility: AIA Pro Achiever 3.0 provides a range of investment options. This flexibility allows you to select funds that align with your risk tolerance and financial objectives, giving you some control over your investments.
  • Professional Guidance: When you choose this plan, you gain access to experienced financial advisors who can provide personalized advice. This can be especially beneficial if you're new to investing and need guidance tailored to your specific circumstances.

Cons:

  • Charges: As you've rightly pointed out, there are charges associated with AIA Pro Achiever 3.0. These include management fees, which can impact your overall returns. It's important to understand these charges and how they may affect your investments.

Robo-Advisors:

Pros:

  • Lower Fees: Robo-advisors typically have lower fees compared to traditional investment-linked policies (ILPs). If cost-effectiveness is a primary concern for you, this could be an attractive option.
  • Simplicity: Robo-advisors are known for their user-friendly interfaces and simplicity. They often offer hassle-free, automated investment solutions that require minimal effort on your part.

Cons:

  • Lack of Personalization: Robo-advisors operate based on algorithms and typically don't provide the same level of personalized advice that a human financial advisor can offer. This can be a drawback if you have unique financial goals or concerns.

Ultimately, the choice between AIA Pro Achiever 3.0 and a robo-advisor depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you value professional guidance, bonuses, and investment flexibility, AIA Pro Achiever 3.0 could be a suitable choice despite the associated charges.

On the other hand, if you're comfortable with a more automated, cost-effective investment approach and don't require insurance coverage within the same policy, a robo-advisor might be a good fit.

I recommend speaking with a financial advisor to discuss your individual financial goals and receive personalized advice that aligns with your objectives.

Please feel free to reach out if you have more questions or need further assistance.

I am currently a Financial Advisor as well, so feel free to reach out to me on IG (@ngooooied) if you have any further questions!

It would be best to use Robo-Advisor over any ILP. Mainly on the additional charges/fees and non liquidity of the ILP, it is not sustainable.

DO NOT EVER BUY ANY ILP FROM ANY INSURANCE COMPANIES.

I bought AXA/HSBC life pulsar in 2015,...

Write your thoughts

Advertisement