Advertisement
My current roboportfolio is down 3% but it has a risk appetite of only 15%. I was thinking if I should increase the risk appetite to grasp the opportunity of cheaper equities/etfs instead of bonds but I’m not sure if it will affect my portfolio in a long run. Please advise!
2
Discussion (2)
Learn how to style your text
Ng Wei En
11 Jun 2020
Analyst at Mastercard
Reply
Save
One important thing to note is the reason why you chose your current risk level.
If the initial reason was due to low risk appetite, which has not change now, then you should not change your allocation due to the possible higher downside. For example, if you are given a 80-20 allocation to bonds and stocks, you should not change it to 20-80 to ride the uptrend since it goes against your initial objective.
If the situation has changed, such as being more financially savvy and able to create better goals, then you can change accordingly.
Reply
Save
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products

4.7
1293 Reviews
StashAway Simple Guaranteed 3.55% p.a. (Guaranteed rate)
Cash Management
INSTRUMENTS
None
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT FEE
None
MINIMUM INVESTMENT
3.5%
EXPECTED ANNUAL RETURN
Mobile App
PLATFORMS

4.7
658 Reviews

4.6
934 Reviews
Related Posts
Advertisement
Hey Guo Wei. I share your thoughts as well. Do note that when you adjust risk, roboadvisors will realise profits/loss on any excess portion of asset classes that should be trimmed when porting over to the new portfolio and buy into asset classes that is required to fulfill the holdings of the new portfolio.
An alternative to changing risk of an existing portfolio would be to cease contribution to your current risk portfolio and contribute to higher isk portfolios. Of course, if you are extremely bearish about your existing portfolio, then changing risk will align your risk profile the most efficiently.