Advertisement
Which is better if possible can list out the pros and cons for both
5
Discussion (5)
Learn how to style your text
Reply
Save
Kylie Ng Kai Li
28 May 2021
Senior Premier Consultant at AIA Insurance Pte Ltd
Both are very different and shouldn't be compared to one another.
And to add on:
For endowments, there's usually a guaranteed/non-guaranteed portion so relatively on the more conservative portfolio.
For robos, they are investments and even if it is a conservative portfolio, the capital is not guaranteed.
Reply
Save
Add on to Chris.
endowments:
generally can only buy through an agent, bank or walk in to insuranc...
Read 2 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products
4.7
1296 Reviews
StashAway Simple Guaranteed 3.55% p.a. (Guaranteed rate)
Cash Management
INSTRUMENTS
None
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT FEE
None
MINIMUM INVESTMENT
3.5%
EXPECTED ANNUAL RETURN
Mobile App
PLATFORMS
4.7
657 Reviews
4.6
935 Reviews
Related Posts
Advertisement
Pros:
Cost-effective: Robo advisors typically charge lower fees compared to traditional financial advisors.
Accessibility: Robo advisors are easily accessible through online platforms, allowing users to manage their investments from anywhere at any time.
Personalization: Robo advisors use algorithms and data analytics to provide personalized investment recommendations based on users' financial goals and risk tolerance.
Diversification: Robo advisors automatically diversify the investment portfolio, spreading the risks across different asset classes.
Transparency: Robo advisors provide users with clear and transparent information regarding their investments, fees, and performance.
@Fnaf Can you continue listing the disadvantages?