Advertisement
Lets say lump sum investing isn't an option due to lack of capital, is there any returns differentials (based on the total stock market index historical performance) if someone adopted differing time-frame DCA approaches, such as $500/month, $1500/Quarter, $3000/6 months etc, considering short term volatility etc.
(Besides saving on brokerage fees if the investment amount is higher)
If someone has any info on this pls enlighten me
2
Discussion (2)
Learn how to style your text
Pang Zhe Liang
04 May 2020
Lead of Research & Solutions at Havend Pte Ltd
Reply
Save
Historically, stock market has an uptrend so the earlier you invest, the more your returns. At the same time, the purpose of DCA is to average out the market prices, and that is better achived with more investments during a period. If your purpose is to reduce the volatility, then it would be better to go with a shorter time frame. If your purpose is for more returns, then you could go with a longer time frame based on past performance.
Reply
Save
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
Advertisement
Dollar cost averaging reduces short-term volatility. With higher frequency, it reduces the average. Here are 5 examples for better understanding:
More Details:
Dollar Cost Averaging
As you can see, the direction in which the asset moves has a direct impact on whether dollar cost averaging works (or not). The frequency will merely alter the average value.
I share quality content on estate planning and financial planning here.