Advertisement

Anonymous

03 Jul 2020

∙

I was late to the party for the TV debate between PAP, WP, PSP and SDP but why is it that PAP had 4.5min to conclude while each of the opposing party only had 1.5min each?

Why is there an imbalance of time allocation?

1

Discussion (1)

What are your thoughts?

Learn how to style your text

d c

03 Jul 2020

Hello! If I recall correctly, it is because WP, PSP and SDP all only had to rebut PAP. However, PAP has to refute WP, PSP and SDP. Hence, PAP has thrice the amount of time to conclude since there are 3 parties to rebut.

Reply

Save

Write your thoughts

Related Posts

Those who watched TV debate with PAP, WP, PSP, SDP, who do you think gave the best answer to what will the party do to help local businesses survive this recession and ensure they're ready to rebound?

What do you think about PAP, WP, SDP and PSP's answers to how the party deal with rising unemployment, create jobs for Singaporeans and ultimately improve the lives of Singaporeans?

WP's Jamus Lim won the hearts of viewers last night for his stellar performance during the online debate. What do you think about Jamus's concluding statement that the WP are not denying PAP a mandate but a blank cheque?

Min. Balakrishnan asked WP’s Jamus how WP would pay for its programmes. Jamus said differences btw PAP & WP lie on where these trade-offs should occur. So where and who will bear these trade-offs?

WP’s Jamus Lim asked Min. Balakrishnan about the efficacy of the policies pumped post-COVID-19 to help raise productivity. Min. Balakrishnan’s answer wasn't very clear. Anyone can enlighten me?

Related Posts

Those who watched TV debate with PAP, WP, PSP, SDP, who do you think gave the best answer to what will the party do to help local businesses survive this recession and ensure they're ready to rebound?

What do you think about PAP, WP, SDP and PSP's answers to how the party deal with rising unemployment, create jobs for Singaporeans and ultimately improve the lives of Singaporeans?

WP's Jamus Lim won the hearts of viewers last night for his stellar performance during the online debate. What do you think about Jamus's concluding statement that the WP are not denying PAP a mandate but a blank cheque?

Min. Balakrishnan asked WP’s Jamus how WP would pay for its programmes. Jamus said differences btw PAP & WP lie on where these trade-offs should occur. So where and who will bear these trade-offs?

WP’s Jamus Lim asked Min. Balakrishnan about the efficacy of the policies pumped post-COVID-19 to help raise productivity. Min. Balakrishnan’s answer wasn't very clear. Anyone can enlighten me?

Advertisement