Advertisement
Anonymous
Due to the charges and increasing cost in the future, should I hold on to the ILP to see if I can potentially generate more returns in the future by doing fund switch since my agent basically does nothing so that I can try to minimise my 8k losses (while paying lower insurance coverage fees for the next few years since the rate is constant for coming years) or should I just terminate it and invest the 2-3k surrender fees? If so, any recommendation on investing so that I can recover my losses?
11
Discussion (11)
Learn how to style your text
Elijah Lee
06 Apr 2021
Senior Financial Services Manager at Phillip Securities (Jurong East)
Reply
Save
Zac
09 Mar 2021
Noob at Idiots Invest
Perhaps you should get a second opinion about this issue from another FA - one who knows your situation well and isn't so hands off like your current agent.
Protection based ILPs are tricky and you should decide whether you're in it more for the protection or the investment.
I have an AIA ILP which I didn't want to service anymore so I just took a premium holiday and let the existing funds cover any cost of insurance. I took up other more targeted coverage (whole life, term plans) so that when the AIA ILP lapses, I'll be adequately covered.
Something for your consideration.
Investment-wise putting your money in a diversified index fund or even a wealth management platform should be more than sufficient to recoup your losses as long as you stay invested for the long term.
Read Hariz's breakdown of pros and cons of a 100% vested ILP.
Reply
Save
Pang Zhe Liang
09 Mar 2021
Lead of Research & Solutions at Havend Pte Ltd
To begin with, go back to your objectives and ask yourself why you got this plan in the first place....
Read 1 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
Advertisement
Hi anon,
I strongly advocate separating investments from insurance.
If the purpose of the ILP was for protection, you should be aware that the costs of insurance on the ILP are guaranteed to increase exponentially over time and will erode your investment returns (which are non-guaranteed). To me, it does not make sense to wait for the so called 'break-even' point to surrender the policy and switch to another alternative as by the time you reach that point, your age will lead to higher premiums, and your health may render you uninsurable.
If the purpose of the ILP was for investments, then there should be zero insurance coverage in the plan, but protection focused ILPs have a minimum sum assured that has to be maintain. As mentioned above, these will eat into your returns.
Although the decision to terminate is ultimately yours and yours alone, remember to have a suitable alternative in place before you terminate as your ILP, despite the drawbacks, is still providing you with coverage, and no one can say for sure what will happen to you in the coming weeks or months. The pain of realizing losses upon surrender does make many hesitate when it comes to going ahead, but you also need to realise that sunk costs can't be recovered, and you are going to have to find a way to recover your losses from elsewhere.
Have a chat with an advisor if you need to crunch numbers or have an in-depth second opinion. Good luck!