Advertisement
Just for the sake of comparison, assuming perfect hindsight and you know you would be free from mishaps and critical illnesses for the first 40 years of your life. Is it still more expensive to pay for coverage from 40 to 65 y/o as compared to someone who has been paying from 25 to 65 y/o? It's easy to work out in terms of total premiums paid. But is it really cheaper if you factor in time value of money?
2
Discussion (2)
Learn how to style your text
Pang Zhe Liang
17 Nov 2020
Lead of Research & Solutions at Havend Pte Ltd
Reply
Save
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Products

4.7
12 Reviews
FWD Term Life Plus Insurance (Renewable Term)
$1,500,000
MAX SUM ASSURED
5 years
PREMIUM TERM
Death, Terminal Illness
COVERAGE

4.3
3 Reviews

5.0
1 Reviews
Related Posts
Advertisement
The cheapest time to buy an insurance policy is the day before you suffer from a mishap or a critical illness. Of course, this is assuming that condition does not fall within the waiting period. Otherwise, you will need to add an additional thirty to ninety days before you buy. That is for the sake of answering your comparison question.
Be that as it may, this also depends on your risk appetite and how much risk you wish to retain vs transfer to the insurance company. The more risk you are willing to undertake yourself, the lesser insurance you need to buy. Consequently, the more savings you have.
However, the moment a catastrophe strikes, time value of money has a negative value now.
I share quality content on estate planning and financial planning here.