Advertisement
Discussion (6)
Learn how to style your text
Loh Tat Tian
19 May 2020
Founder at PolicyWoke (We Buy Insurance Policies)
Reply
Save
Elijah Lee
16 May 2020
Senior Financial Services Manager at Phillip Securities (Jurong East)
Hi,
I presume you are talking about CPF SA topup via RSTU or CPF MA-VC. Both will reduce your taxable income and I would personally do that first as there is the added benefit of growing the monies at 4% which is very decent.
Yes, there is no way I can touch my MA monies, and my SA only becomes accessible after I set aside the FRS at 55, but by starting early, I can let compounding work in my favour, helping me to meet BHS and FRS faster. Should I need to continue to reduce my taxable income after maximizing my CPF top ups, I would then turn to SRS.
Reply
Save
Cryotosensei
16 May 2020
Blogger at diaperfinancingfund.blogspot.com
While CPF SA top-ups yields at least 4% per annum and SRS contributions yield 0.04% per annum if jus...
Read 2 other comments with a Seedly account
You will also enjoy exclusive benefits and get access to members only features.
Sign up or login with an email here
Write your thoughts
Related Articles
Related Posts
Related Posts
Advertisement
If you are savvy in investment, top up to SRS is fine.
If you are not savving in investment, top up to CPF is fine.
If you have too much tax to reduce, top up both is even better.
Its not a either or, but whether which suits you more.
Take care to ask for help for SRS investments too (stashaway at least) for passive investment.