Advertisement
OPINIONS
A guide to CPF SA Shielding.
Tan Choong Hwee
Edited 08 Dec 2022
Investor/Trader at Home
This Opinion post first appeared in my blog here: https://pwlcm.wordpress.com/2022/01/08/guide-to-cpf-sa-shielding/
I have written another post on CPF SA Shieldig using T-Bills here: https://pwlcm.wordpress.com/2022/10/05/guide-to-cpf-sa-shielding-using-t-bills/
Refer to the list of acronyms on CPF and Investment in the following blog posts: https://pwlcm.wordpress.com/2022/01/06/acronym-cpf/ https://pwlcm.wordpress.com/2022/01/07/acronym-investment/
Disclaimer: This post is just for educational sharing purposes. Please do your own due diligence on any products mentioned in this post.
One of the topics frequently discussed in chat groups, online communities and social networking sites is this “hack” called “CPF SA Shielding”.
The origin of CPF SA Shielding is attributed to an article published in Straits Times on 20 October 2019 titled “Four ways to optimise your CPF savings” by Lorna Tan, former Invest Editor at Straits Times then. Specifically it was the first step “Maximising CPF” she described in the article that is now known as CPF SA Shielding or SA Shielding in short.
The whole process of SA Shielding involves 2 different CPF schemes for 2 different purposes introduced at 2 different times:
On 55th birthday, RA is created with up to Full Retirement Sum (FRS, $192,000 for 2022). This FRS amount is first transferred from SA, and if SA savings is not sufficient, the remaining balance would be transferred from OA.
Since SA and OA interest rates are 4% and 2.5% respectively, we naturally prefer RA to be formed more from OA than SA. That is where SA Shielding comes in, where we set aside at least $40,000 in SA and “shield” the remaining balance by investing under CPFIS just before 55th birthday.
After RA is formed on 55th birthday, we can “unshield” by liquidating the CPFIS investment and returning the sales proceeds to SA. And now we have more savings in the two 4% interest rates accounts (SA and RA) than if we don’t do SA Shielding. We gain additional 1.5% interests on the shielded amount as it is effectively transferred from OA to SA.
To understand the above description visually, you may refer to the following articles on SA Shielding that present nice and easy-to-visualize infographics, special credit to a talented friend Kit who did one on her Instagram:
MoneyOwl: https://www.moneyowl.com.sg/articles/sa-shielding-pros-cons/
The role of the CPFIS SA investment in SA Shielding is to “hide” some amount in SA from being transferred to RA during the RA creation process. We should be looking at low risk, low cost, low volatility and high liquidity investment products. And we want to keep the investment holding period to within 1 or 2 calendar months so that we would not be missing more than 2 month worth of SA interests.
Among the products approved for CPFIS SA investment, unit trusts meet the low cost and high liquidity criteria. There are zero fees platforms these days (e.g. POEMS, dollarDEX, FSMOne) where we can trade unit trusts without incurring any sales charges, switching fees, and platform fees. And fund houses are guaranteed to transact unit trusts at the Net Asset Value (NAV) price.
There is a wide spectrum of unit trusts with different risk and volatility levels. Those near the lower risk lower volatility end of the spectrum would be money market funds and short term bond funds. I use FSMOne Fund Selector tools to search for candidates with the following parameters:
The tools generated the following Funds Table as of 7 January 2022:
Among the 3 unit trusts listed, the Nikko AM Shenton Short Term Bond Fund has the lowest Risk Rating and the lowest Annual Expense Ratio. It satisfies the low risk low cost criteria we set. Incidentally, this is the same fund Lorna used in her own SA Shielding manoeuvre.
To study the volatility of this fund, I have downloaded its historical price data (up till 31 December 2021) from Yahoo Finance: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/0P00006G1T.SI/history?p=0P00006G1T.SI
I added 2 columns to the spreadsheet, 5-Day Price Move and 10-Day Price Move. This is to study how much did the price move in 1-week and 2-week periods. I searched for the largest loss the fund incurred and the date that it happened. Here is the result:
The largest 5-Day and 10-day losses were -0.98% and -1.70%, both happened on 25 March 2020, during the fast and furious stock market crash due to COVID-19 pandemic. To reduce the volatility risk, we want to keep the holding period as short as possible. Adding potential loss of up to 2 months of SA interests (4% x 2 / 12 = 0.67%), total loss might be up to 1.65% if we keep to 5-day holding period. This loss can be recovered by about 13 month of additional 1.5% interests.
The benefits of SA Shielding is 1.5% higher interest rate for the Shield Amount, but at a potential risk of up to 1.65% loss in the process, a loss that is recoverable within 13 months. Therefore, it is generally beneficial to go for SA Shielding for those below age 55, except for the following situations:
May the Shield be with you!
Comments
6608
3
ABOUT ME
Tan Choong Hwee
Edited 08 Dec 2022
Investor/Trader at Home
Blogger, Investor
6608
3
Advertisement
No comments yet.
Be the first to share your thoughts!